Are the Spaniards going to enter in the new century anytime?

Today, reading an article about the Spanish low productivity made me think about the investment in R+D+i (Research, development and innovation) and I realized that in Spain, we almost do not know what that means, and there is no doubt that the relationship between innovation and productivity is inversely proportional, besides, with the current high competition what makes the difference is innovation.

Regardless the current financial crisis that Spain is suffering, the investment in R+D+i has been always very low, much lower than in the EU, EEUU and Japan. The countries which invest more are the Scandinavian, Germany, Austria and EEUU which have known to keep this potential innovation despite of the financial crisis and have connected salaries with productivity.

The main problems to invest in innovation in Spain are that the companies closest to this sector only represent a 1% of the GDP. The economic system, formed by small and medium enterprises with one to ten employees, that is why integrating in innovation for these companies is almost impossible; this task is developed by international subsidiaries in Spain or Spanish firms like Repsol, Acciona or Telefónica.

Another big problem caused by this low investment is this “brain drain”, which is not only the reason of the lack of talents and the economic and development lost, but also the fact that thousands of students are educated at our public universities, investing in materials, laboratories, lecturer’s formation and then we do not provide the option of finding a job related to their studies, so, the emigrate and another country hire then without any education cost. Does it have any sense? I do not understand why an education is provided, all those costs/investments for nothing. Would not it be better if we invest more in R+D+I and get something back and grow, learn and enter in the 21st century?

We should think in something more that construction industry.

Currency war

It is not unknown the great Chinese economic growth, but maybe is not so known the cold war which is being fought between USA and China due to the currency devaluation to increase their exports.

Some specialists do not want to call it war, but the truth is that the “old red phone” is now of the hook

United States has been living above its possibilities, its expenses were much higher than its returns, however, now is trying to save, but the consumption is lower, for that, exporting is so important, to keep the economic growth, that is the reason why USA is trying to devalue the Dollar, to make it cheaper for the other countries and make their purchases in America cheaper.

At the same time, the Dollar devaluation is not in the interest of China, because its currency would be more expensive and its exports will decrease and it will have to increase the intern consumption and save less that is why China is also trying to devaluate the Yuan and buying American debt, and here is another reason why the Americans do not want the dollar to increase its value, because they will have to pay less for its debt.

Summarizing, China wants to devaluate its currency, other Asian countries which do not want to have a disadvantage (including Japan) are doing the same, USA does not stay behind, so, who is losing more in this war is the Euro because countries like Greece, Spain, Portugal, Ireland and Italy do not want a revaluated Euro, because the need to export to avoid their economic problems. If the Euro price increases, they sell less. In this war, nobody wants to lose.

Let’s hope this war to finish, because the history tells us that in the thirties, the consequences of a similar war were not very positive.

Should we fire government employees?

Despite of the current economic crisis, Goldman Sachs and J.P.Morgan have announced a new recession in 2012, besides the low Spanish production. In these saving and cutting times some voices are claiming to be able to fire government employees in the case of a bad economic situation or low productivity. Should we fire government employees? Greece has been the first country to announce a massive public employees dismiss.


Everybody has had to tighten their belts, I think that the fact of firing people due to their low productive or the economic crisis is totally logic and advisable

If a private sector employee is not productive and could be fired, why a public one can’t? The public administration is that, public, and it is very bad managed specially if we take into account that in Spain, we have a government employees excess and a poor production, paying an employee for doing nothing have no sense.

I do not share the idea of being invulnerable just for passing an exam and receiving a salary for your entirely life and doing nothing in return. In the other hand, it is very sad to have that dream, my target is not just receiving a salary but also consider myself useful, satisfied with what I do and have the chance of growing and learning, knowing that I am not stealing anybody.

I’d outsource some public functions, this way we could save a great amount of money and specially we would be more competitive and increase our low productivity.

Is Google a dangerous monopolist?

Thirteen years after its foundation, Google Inc. is one of the most profitable and successful companies in the world. What started being a search engine, today has a wide range of products and services like Google Earth, Gmail, Maps, Youtube, Google Chrome, etc. but, isn’t it dangerous that a company holds that power? Does it affect to the market freedom?

The main power of Google is its search engine, overwhelming leader in the world which act like an information filter , if something does not appear in Google, it does not exist, it provides or hides the information they want, it could make a company, organization or person disappear, and soon it will be more powerful than the Governments.

 

Besides, between all the services it provides, the user register and give and could save a lot of personal information, these are the most dangerous problems. What consequences could have the fact of that a company could hold that amount of personal information? Actually, Google is having some legal problems about the user’s privacy.  Right now all those questions are in the air; Google is growing so fast and is so international that it is very difficult to guess what will happen in the future. Its technology capacity and specially its free services are making that Google increases its market share. The Google reality is full of lights but with some darks that we should take into account.

 

In my opinion, taking a look at the market shares in the world (90.1% in the UK, 61% in the USA, and 92.5 in Germany) Google is a monopoly, because I think that a monopoly situation is not only caused by the number of competitors but also by the market share, besides I consider that is a very dangerous monopoly because Google could make a decision and cause a company goes out of business, especially if it is a web which profits depends on the visits and advertising, if Google deletes that company from its search, the company would simply disappear, and the same will happen with organization or even people.

 

Google has a wider and better range of services than its competitors and with its search engine it favors the use its services and products, just a click, and it is true that all those vantages have been achieved starting with equal opportunities in the market, Google is what it is due to its own merits, there are no exit barriers in the market but there are currently many entry barriers motivated to all the power concentrated by just one company, and that makes impossible to face Google, but this is not the main problem, the main problem is the great amount of personal information which Google owns and that amount will be higher due to its increase in the storage capacity which could be much more superior than the governmental centers of the USA. How could be it stopped? I think that if we do not stop it, we will sorry of giving that power to a company.

Chinese shops

Chinese immigrants come to Spain for some simple reasons that would make anybody migrate. On one hand we could find a communist politic system that although is showing an opened-image, is oppressive and control the life of its citizens. The economic situation is not better, more tan 26m people live on the poverty line, so If they don’t have freedom and there’s poverty, what do they have? The immigration hope that obviously does not only go to Spain, the most preferred places are Taiwan, where there are more than 25m Chinese, Malaysia, Indonesia, USA, the UK and some European countries like ours.

They come to Spain with their life savings, starting their business, illegally in the majority of the cases, where they invest all their money without paying taxes and social security

The products they sell are bought in Chine, with a lower price, they have workdays that seems don’t have finish, and you will never see them enjoying their free time. Let me say that they come to work like Chinese, and collect money like they do with the rice in Chine, to go back to Chine an live like a Chinese emperor.

Every single company opened in Spain must have an administration hedge, licenses, being a juridical person, all the employers must have a social security hedge,etc, in the Chinese Shops don’t obey the law, so they don’t pay taxes, and if we take into account that their product cost are very low, they have a very important competitive advantage over the Spanish Shops. So, it’s very easy to understand why the Chinese come to Spain to entrepreneur.

The Spanish entrepreneurs try to defend from this competence saying that Spanish products have a better quality, but don’t the people who buy in Chinese shops know it? In my opinion Chinese shops are a very good option if you need something that doesn’t require a good quality or when the other shops are closed, cause they seem to be always open.

The Chinese competence is getting specialized, now we can find “zara” clother, with its logo having a much lower price and a very similar esthetic appearance.